Writers take note: I read the book based on its title and cover and a sense that there must be a story there. I was ready for a historical novel and enjoy most things British. That and Amazon invited me to read the book for free on my Kindle. But I was unsure of what to think. Most reviewers praised the book. High praise. A few, though, scoffed and said it was a poor attempt at writing the classic British novel. The history is all wrong, the characters are flat, and the plot? Outrageous and silly.
I don’t know if the history is right or wrong; it was close enough from my vantage. The plain fact is that I don’t read historical novels for fealty to events. In a novel of this sort, I enjoy the terroir and general feeling of the language and setting. It is, after all, a work of fiction. Doesn’t every writer toy with fact?
Beefs? The plot veers into the fantastic. Imagine the most outrageous thing that could happen next, and it does. And none of the characters change in any real sense from when they are first introduced. But, I still turned each page to know what happened next.
And isn’t that how a reader judges a book?
Thanks so much for reading. Can you think of someone else who would enjoy the post? Someone who can’t get their rear in the chair to write? Please mail it to them or share with your favorite social media using one of the icons below. And won’t you follow me? You can do so in the sidebar. Thanks again! And feel free to comment!